PENGEMBANGAN THREE TIER DIAGNOSTIC TEST UNTUK MENGIDENTIFIKASI MISKONSEPSI MAHASISWA PAUD
Keywords:
three tier, miskonsepsi, anak usia diniAbstract
Latar belakang dalam penelitian ini adalah identifikasi miskonsepsi merupakan langkah yang penting untuk mengetahui pemahaman mahasiswa tentang pembelajaran. tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengembangkan alat uji miskonsepsi berupa three tier diagnostic test yang digunakan untuk mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi pada mahasiswa PG PAUD. Sampel penelitian yang digunakan dalam three tier diagnostic test yang dikembangkan berdasarkan wawancara (n = 11), dan uji terbuka (n = 25) Desain dan metode yang digunaka terdiri dari dua fase. Fase pertama yang digunakan adalah pengembangan three tier diagnostic test dan fase kedua adalah desaun cross sectonal survey. Hasil dari penelitian diantaranya validasi dari 3 dosen ahli.
References
I. A. S. Ekayati and D. I. Efendi, “Profil Prakonsepsi Mahasiswa Pada Konsep Pengenalan Warna Pada Anak Usia Dini,” Pros. SNasPPM, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 96–99, 2018.
S. K. Abell, K. Appleton, and D. L. Hanuscin, Handbook of research on science education. Routledge, 2013.
D. Kaltakci and A. Eryilmaz, “Identifying Pre-service Physics Teachers’ Misconceptions With Three-Tier Tests,” pp. 1–8, 2008.
M. Maison, I. C. Safitri, and R. W. Wardana, “Identification of Misconception of High School Students on Temperature and Calor Topic Using Four-Tier Diagnostic Instrument,” Edusains, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 195–202, 2020, doi: 10.15408/es.v11i2.11465.
B. Chazbeck and Z. Ayoubi, “Resources used by Lebanese Secondary Physics Teachers’ for Teaching Electricity: Types, Objectives and Factors Affecting their Selection,” J. Educ. Sci. Environ. Heal., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 118–128, 2018.
N. J. Fratiwi, T. R. Ramalis, and A. Samsudin, “The Three-tier Diagnostic Instrument: Using Rasch Analysis to Develop and Assess K-10 Students’ Alternative Conceptions on Force Concept,” in RSU International Research Conference, 2019.
A. Samsudin et al., “Alleviating students’ misconceptions about newton’s first law through comparing Pdeode* e tasks and POE tasks: Which is more effective,” Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol., pp. 215–221, 2017.
D. Kaltakci-Gurel, A. Eryilmaz, and L. C. McDermott, “Development and application of a four-tier test to assess pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions about geometrical optics,” Res. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 238–260, 2017.
H.-D. Barke, A. Hazari, and S. Yitbarek, Misconceptions in chemistry: Addressing perceptions in chemical education. Springer Science & Business Media, 2008.
L. C. McDermott, P. R. L. Heron, P. S. Shaffer, and M. R. Stetzer, “Improving the preparation of K-12 teachers through physics education research,” Am. J. Phys., vol. 74, no. 9, pp. 763–767, 2006.
S. Chen, “Shadows: young Taiwanese children’s views and understanding,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 59–79, 2009.
F. M. Goldberg and L. C. McDermott, “Student difficulties in understanding image formation by a plane mirror,” Phys. Teach., vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 472–481, 1986.
D. Palmer, “Students’ alternative conceptions and scientifically acceptable conceptions about gravity,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 691–706, 2001.
E. Adadan and F. Savasci, “An analysis of 16–17-year-old students’ understanding of solution chemistry concepts using a two-tier diagnostic instrument,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 513–544, 2012.
C.-C. Chen, H.-S. Lin, and M.-L. Lin, “Developing a two-tier diagnostic instrument to assess high school students’ understanding-the formation of images by a plane mirror,” Proceedings-National Sci. Counc. Repub. China Part D Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 106–121, 2002.
D. K. Gurel, A. Eryilmaz, and L. C. McDermott, “A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconceptions in science,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 989–1008, 2015, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a.
H. Peşman and A. Eryılmaz, “Development of a three-tier test to assess misconceptions about simple electric circuits,” J. Educ. Res., vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 208–222, 2010.
D. F. Treagust, “Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 159–169, 1988, doi: 10.1080/0950069880100204.
C. Tsui and D. Treagust, “Evaluating secondary students’ scientific reasoning in genetics using a two‐tier diagnostic instrument,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1073–1098, 2010.
R. MILLAR and V. HAMES, “Using research to clarify learning goals and measure outcomes,” in Improving subject teaching, Routledge, 2006, pp. 58–73.
E. Istiyono, D. Mardapi, and S. Suparno, “Pengembangan tes kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi fisika (pysthots) peserta didik SMA,” J. Penelit. dan Eval. Pendidik., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2014.
H. O. Arslan, C. Cigdemoglu, and C. Moseley, “A three-tier diagnostic test to assess pre-service teachers’ misconceptions about global warming, greenhouse effect, ozone layer depletion, and acid rain,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 1667–1686, 2012.
