Validity Of Numeration Akm Based Module Development To Improve Problem Solving Abilities Of Elementary School Students

  • Yulaikah
  • Warli
Keywords: validity, numeration module, problem-solving

Abstract

The PISA score for Indonesian mathematics in 2018 shows 71% of students are below the minimum competency. This is because the students' ability to solve problems is still low. Students' problem-solving abilities can be improved using numeracy AKM-based modules. How to develop numeracy AKM based modules to improve students' problem-solving skills? This study aims to produce quality numeracy AKM-based modules to improve students' problem-solving abilities. This research is development research by adapting the Plomp development model with four phases, namely the initial investigation phase, the design phase, the realization/construction phase, and the test, evaluation, and revision phases. There were 3 product tests carried out, namely the validity test, the practicality test, and the effectiveness test. However, in this study, the proposed product test only reached the validity test. Based on the results of the validation analysis of numeracy based AKM module development, the assessment scores obtained are as follows: title 4.3, preface 4.4, description of chapter 4.4, appropriateness of content 4.4, presentation of content 4.4, language rules and illustrations 4.5, Exercise 4.4, reference 3.8, other calibrations 4, so that the final score is 4.3. Thus, the numeracy AKM-based module is declared valid, so it is suitable for use by elementary school students in learning.

References

Fahman Lupojo, Abdul; Rosadi, Asep;Luden Pagiling, S. (2016). Penelitian Pengembangan Model Plomp. Slideshare.

Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2000). Principles and standards for School Mathematics.

Gede Pernawinadi, I. (2019). Validitas Konstruk dan Uji Reliabilitas Instrumen. Private Library I Gede Purnawinadi.

GLN. (2020). Buku Literasi Numerasi. Kemendikbud RI.

Imran, S. (2014). Fungsi modul dalam Pembelajaran. Ilmu Pendidikan.Net.

Juliana, Ekawati, D., & Basir, F. (2017). Deskripsi Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel. Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika STKIP Siliwangi Bandung, 2(1), 121–133.

Karp, J. A. V. D. W. K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2013). Elementary and Middle School Mathematics Teaching Developmentally. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 53, Issue 9).

Kemendikbud. (2020). Koordinasi Asesmen Nasional.

Kreano, J. (2012). Desain Model Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika. Kreano: Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 3(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v3i1.2613

Kurniasih, I., & Sani, B. (2014). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Konsep dan Penerapan. Kementrian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1–162.

Roza, Y. (2019). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Pada Materi Peluang Berdasarkan Self-Regulated Learning (S-RL). 4(1), 23–31.

Saifuddin, I. (2019). Jurnal Riset Pembelajaran Matematika ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH DIMENSI TIGA PADA SISWA SMA. 1(April), 11–18.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, da R&D. ALFABETA.

Sujak, A. (2000). Mengajar Generasi Z. PT. Pustaka Insan Mandiri.

Syaban, M. (2018). Inductive-Deductive Learning Approach to Develop Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Skill and Selfefficacy.

Wulandari, N. Y. (2018). Uji Validasi Isi Modul Psikoedukasi Tutorial Membaca Permulaan Untuk Guru Sekolah Dasar. Insight: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 20(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.26486/psikologi.v20i1.632
Published
2021-07-30