COMPARATIVE LITERATURE OF DISNEY FILMS BEAUTY AND THE BEAST AND THE PRINCESS AND THE FROG
Keywords:
Comparative Literature, Differences, Folktale, SimilaritiesAbstract
This research explores the comparative literature of two Disney films, Beauty and the Beast and The Princess and the Frog Both films are analyzed using a comparative approach to uncover similarities and differences in themes, plots, characters, settings, and cultural influences. The study employs a descriptive method and qualitative content analysis techniques to analyze data from the film scripts. The findings reveal that both films emphasize the transformative power of love and feature strong female protagonists challenging traditional gender roles. However, differences emerge in their specific themes, plot structures, character traits, settings, and cultural contexts. Beauty and the Beast centers around inner beauty and appearances, while The Princess and the Frog focuses on the power of love. The characters of Belle and Tiana have distinct personalities and aspirations, and the films' settings reflect different cultural backgrounds. Overall, this research showcases the richness and diversity of storytelling in different cultural contexts, highlighting the significance of comparative literature in understanding and appreciating the power of narratives.
References
A. Nur, D. Kurniawati, and U. Yuliasari, “An Analysis Of Conflict And Main Character ’ s Personality In A Movie Me Before You,” no. 1949, pp. 235–240, 2021.
Wikipedia, “About Us - Comparative literature,” Wikipedia. wikipedia, 2018. doi: www.brown.edu.
S. T. de Zepetnek, Comparative Literature : Theory, Method, Application, 18th ed. amsterdam, atlanta, 1998.
W. Disney, Beauty and the Beast. Canada: Buena Vista Pictures Distribution.Inc., 1991.
H. Remak, “Compa rative Literature, Its Definition and Function. In: Stallknecht, N.P. and Frenz, H., Eds., Com parative Literature: Method and Perspective,” South. Illinois Univ. Press. Carbondale, 3, 1961.
A. Noryunita and D. Purwatiningsih, “COMPARATIVE LITERATUREOF NOVEL SURAT KECIL UNTUK TUHANAND OSCARAND THE LADY IN PINK Andri Noryunita and Dewi Purwatiningsih Trunojoyo Madura University,” pp. 46–56.
wordpress, “Theory of comparative literature.” Wordpress, pp. 1–14. doi: https://maenglishsite.files.wordpress.com/2016/04/theory-of-comparative-lit-an-overview.pdf.
James Danandjaja, Folklor Indonesia :ilmu gosip, dongeng, dan lain-lain. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti, 1994.
N. Syahrul, S. Sunarti, P. Purwaningsih, and S. Suryami, “The Comparative Historical Study of ‘Malin Deman and Puti Bungsu’ Legend from Indonesia with ‘Niu Lang and Zhi Nu’ from China,” 2022, doi: 10.4108/eai.15-9-2021.2315609.
R. Wardarita and G. Puspo Negoro, “A Comparative Study: The Folktale of Jaka Tarub (Indonesia) and Tanabata (Japan),” Adv. Lang. Lit. Stud., vol. 8, no. 6, p. 1, 2017, doi: 10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.6p.1.
I. Masofa and I. Sumarsono, “Comparative Literature in Indonesian Folktale’S Timun Mas and Disney’S Beauty and the Beast,” Ling. Sci., vol. 28, no. 2, 2021.
B. S. K. Bogdan Robert, Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods. California: Pearson A & B, University of California, 2007.
A. Naufalia, “Character Education in Malin Kundang and Shim Cheong, a Filial Child: A comparative literary study,” vol. 424, no. Icollite 2019, pp. 102–106, 2020, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.200325.062.
D. M. Siegel and S. H. McDaniel, “THE FROG PRINCE: Tale and Toxicology,” Am. J. Orthopsychiatry, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 558–562, 1991, doi: 10.1037/h0079283.
S. Bassnett, “Comparative Literature A Critical Introduction,” UK Blackwell Publ., 1993.
